Fair Immigration Model

• Each immigrant needs to make a net positive contribution to their host country. The extent of their net contribution is contingent on the overall percentage of immigrants within the nation. In essence, a higher percentage of immigrants places a greater strain on the infrastructure, necessitating the construction of additional houses, roads, utilities (including water, electricity, sewage, and recycling facilities), hospitals, schools, and other public services. In a Western country with an immigration level of approximately 15%, an annual tax contribution of around EUR 40k per immigrant would be required.

• Citizenship through naturalization is solely determined by merits. To acquire citizenship, each immigrant must make a net tax contribution within a specific timeframe (5 - 7 years) equivalent to the amount required to construct a new residential unit (e.g. in Ireland, EUR 350k). Time-based citizenship by naturalization is not viable since it does not consider one's contribution.

In order to achieve a stable and sustainable society for the future, it is imperative to implement re-immigration as a necessary step. This approach involves capping the foreign population at 10%, which can alleviate the strain on essential services like housing, education, healthcare, and prisons. Furthermore, it has the potential to significantly reduce the environmental impact caused by the continuous construction of new housing units.

​

When it comes to prioritizing re-immigration options, the following scale should be considered for individuals returning to their home country or seeking a safe haven:

​

a) Foreign criminals (ensuring that prisons are not burdened with offshore criminals)

b) Radical immigrants

c) Illegal immigrants

d) Asylum seekers outside their designated area

e) Welfare immigrants.

• Immigrants should not under any circumstances, have access to the welfare system within the country. Such an arrangement would be unfair both to the local community in the host country, which must fund the welfare of immigrants, and to all those in need globally who lack an opportunity for immigration. Consequently, immigrants are not eligible for welfare payments, such as unemployment benefits, children's benefits, free healthcare, social housing, and so forth.

• When refugees are looking to seek asylum, they must ensure that they submit their applications within the designated regional catchment area. This area is located near the country where the crisis has occurred. It is crucial to understand that European countries can only provide a safe haven to those within their catchment area, such as the Balkans and Ukraine. However, asylum seekers still have the option to seek refuge in their specific catchment area, which includes regions such as the Middle East, East and West Africa, Central Asia, the Indian Subcontinent, and Latin and Central America.

• In order to mitigate the burden on our infrastructure due to immigration, it is imperative to implement a cap. This cap should be fixed at 10% of the prevailing population. After hitting this threshold, no further immigration will be allowed until the percentage falls below 10% (within a period of 10 to 20 years). There should be no individual area (town, village) or institution (school) with more than 20% of foreigners. The computation for immigration encompasses all individuals who are foreign-born or whose parents were born outside the country, including asylum seekers, welfare immigrants, economic immigrants, family reunion, and students.

Every migrant (or migrant family) is expected to make a positive economic contribution to the host nation through their employment, considering their prior education and skill set before arriving in the host country.

Migrants are required to abide by the laws of the host country.

Asylum seekers should seek refuge in areas close to the crisis or within the designated "catchment area" to ensure the efficient allocation of global resources and to mitigate the adverse impacts of mass migration and human trafficking.

Migrants, whether as individuals or communities, should not attempt to impose their cultural, linguistic, or religious practices on the host community. They have been welcomed into the receiving communities to contribute economically (as net taxpayers) rather than to alter the cultural or demographic fabric.